I know there are some teachers and schools that don't force their students to buy coursebooks. How do others feel about this? Coursebooks can be limiting, non-diverse, costly, outdated on first day of printing and aging and not fresh thereafter, etc. Now that the Internet is in all reaches of Mexico, isn't it time to move away from being slaves to mostly boring books ... and take advantage of an organic and alive Internet full of current and diverse material?
In other parts of the world, schools are moving away from the stronghold of publishers that push to sell a product to classes that are project oriented and inquiry based using the Internet and real- and virtual life authentic materials, thus creating a more valuable pedagogic experience that prepares students with 21st century skills in a globalized world.
Books are great for classics, like works of Edgar Alan Poe that remain classically static. Are we ready to get out from under the weight of books and modernize our classroom practices. Or do teachers still need the crutch to limp along as always?
With a good curriculum and syllabus and trained teachers, one laptop per student (and interactive whiteboards, etc) is a better investment than all the money that parents spend on books that only last 1 year and are outdated and boring; and have to been heavily modified anyway to meet the unique needs of our learners. Are course books really constructivist since the feed a pre-decided context, content, sequencing and specific grammar in a linear fashion?
Tags:
Share
-
▶ Reply to This